Test one thing at a time in cold email

Change one line, split the list at random, send both at once, and only call a winner when the gap is bigger than chance.

By Angelo Natale30 minOne test at a time, read after each batch

What it does

Most cold email tests are noise. Two versions go out to 200 people each, one gets 6 replies and the other 9, and the “winner” becomes the new standard. At those numbers, a gap that size comes up by chance about 4 times in 10. Test one thing at a time, on big enough batches, and check whether the gap is real before you change anything.

What you need

  • A sending tool that can split a campaign into versions
  • A list big enough to split
  • A spreadsheet

How it works

  1. Pick one thing to test

    The first line, the question, the PS or the subject. Just one. If you change two things and it wins, you won’t know which one did it.

  2. Write down what you expect before you send

    “The version with the PS gets more positive replies.” Measure positive replies, not opens. Opens aren’t reliable: some email apps load the tracking pixel whether or not anyone reads the email.

  3. Split the list at random, and send both at once

    Same list, same days, same inboxes. Your sending tool’s A/B feature does the split. Never test one version this week and the other next week.

  4. Check whether the gap is bigger than chance

    Google Sheets: paste into A1, swap in your numbers, and format D4 as a percent
    	Sent	Positive replies	Reply rate
    Version A	500	10	=C2/B2
    Version B	500	15	=C3/B3
    Chance a gap this big is luck			=2*(1-NORM.S.DIST(ABS(D2-D3)/SQRT(((C2+C3)/(B2+B3))*(1-(C2+C3)/(B2+B3))*(1/B2+1/B3)),TRUE))

    Under 5%, the gap is probably real. Above that, you don’t have a winner yet: keep both versions sending. As a guide from the standard sample-size math, telling a 2% reply rate from a 3% one with confidence takes about 3,800 sends per version, not a few hundred.

  5. Keep the winner, then test the next thing

    Log every test: what changed, the sends, the replies, the chance figure and what you decided. If a winner surprises you, run it once more before it goes into every campaign.

What good looks like

A log of tests where every change you kept beat the old version by more than chance.

An example, not a client story. Version A gets 10 positive replies from 500 sends, version B gets 15 from 500. B looks 50% better, but the sheet says a gap that size comes up by chance about 3 times in 10. Both versions keep sending until each has a few thousand sends.

Mistakes to skip

  • Testing on opens.
  • Calling a winner after a few hundred sends.
  • Changing the list and the words at the same time.
  • Sending each version in a different week, or from different inboxes.

More playbooks

All 64 playbooks →

Rather not run it yourself?

I build the whole system with you, so you just take the calls.

Every playbook here is one piece of it. On a 60-minute growth diagnostic we put your numbers on the system and work out how long it would take you to double.

Book your growth diagnostic